Child pages
  • Bamboo CI Server Reviews & Comparisons
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Independent reviews and comparisons for the Bamboo continuous integration server:

Reviews

1. Java Tools Roundup

"Bamboo, a commercial CI tool from Atlassian, has introduced many powerful features in [the area of build metrics], including graphs showing both build duration over time and individual test duration over time." - Dec 2008

2. SpringSource Bamboo Review

"I won't give a complete feature list of Bamboo here, but I want to mention a couple of things that really sealed it for us. The main thing is the incredible visibility into the projects. Using Bamboo we're easily able to keep track of build times and failure rates which allows us have an overall view of the health of the project." - Apr 2007

3. Choosing a CI

"There’s been a lot of noise about Bamboo - and I liked it when I gave it a test run a few months back." - Jun 2007

Comparisons

Each (tick) indicates where it is compared with another CI tool:

 

AntHill Pro

Bamboo

Continuum

Cruise Control

Hudson

ParaBuild

Zutubi Pulse

TeamCity

CI Feature Matrix on ThoughtWorks

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

Choosing a CI on Generation Java blog

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

(tick)

Continuous Integration Server Comparison on Chris Read's blog

(tick)

(tick)


(tick)

(tick)

 

(tick)

(tick)

Bamboo vs Hudson thread on Atlassian forums

 

(tick)

 

 

(tick)

 

 

 

Java Tools Roundup by SonaType

 

(tick)

 

 

(tick)

 

 

 

Bamboo vs CruiseControl in the ThoughtWorks wiki

 

(tick)

 

(tick)

 

 

 

 

SpringSource Bamboo Review on the Spring Source blog

 

(tick)

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Also

  • No labels