Automatic branch merging

Using branches in Bitbucket Server

On this page

Still need help?

The Atlassian Community is here for you.

Ask the community

Bitbucket Server can automatically merge changes to newer release branches, reducing the need for manual maintenance of branches. This page describes best practices for establishing a branching strategy conducive for automatic branch merging, and how to enable it for individual repositories or all repositories in a project.

Conditions for automatic merging

In order to use automatic branch merging, Bitbucket Server has to be able to determine the ordering of branches, and relies on semantic versioning of branch names. For example, Bitbucket Server will order these branch names like this: 1.0.0 < 2.0.0 < 2.1.0 < 2.1.1. Read more about the Branch ordering algorithm, including some examples of branch ordering, later on this page. Bitbucket Server expects that the 'development' branch, typically the default branch, is always ahead of any 'release' branches. The final merge in the automatic cascade will be to the 'development' branch.

These conditions must also be satisfied:

  • branching model must be configured.
  • The 'release' branch type must be enabled or a 'production' branch must be set.
  • The merge must be made using a pull request to a 'release' or 'production' branch type.
  • There must be newer branches than the target branch of the pull request.

Good to know:

  • Automatic merging is off by default.
  • Commit messages will indicate a merge was automatic.
  • There are audit log entries for automatic merges.
  • Notifications are sent when merges succeed or fail.

What happens if an automatic merge fails?

When an automatic merge fails, Bitbucket Server creates a new pull request for the failed merge, and the automatic merge operation stops. You should resolve the conflict locally before approving the new merge, which may start a new series of cascading merges. Note that a pull request that gets automatically opened when a merge fails won't trigger the continuation of the initial merge chain if resolved locally (which is the approach that we recommend).

There are a few reasons an automatic merge could fail:

  • There could be a conflict detected that prevents the merge.
  • There is already an open pull request with the same source and target that the automatic merge would close.

Enable automatic branch merging

You can enable automatic branch merging for all repositories in a project, and choose to inherit or override this setting in individual repositories. 

Enable automatic branch merging for all repositories in a project

All repositories in a project can inherit or override the branching model, including automatic branch merging. 

To enable automatic branch merging for all repositories in a project (requires project admin permission):

  1. Go to Project settings > Branching model.
  2. Select Enable automatic merging, then click Save.

 

Enable automatic branch merging for a single repository

To enable automatic branch merging for a single repository:

  1. Go to Repository settings > Branching model.
  2. Select Enable automatic merging, then click Save.

Branch ordering algorithm

Bitbucket Server is able to automatically merge changes to newer release branches, as long as Bitbucket Server can determine the ordering of those branches. Ordering is based on semantic versioning in the naming pattern for branches.

Bitbucket Server uses the following ordering algorithm to determine the branches in the merge chain:

  • Branches are selected and ordered on the basis of the name of the branch that started the cascade (i.e. the target of the pull request for the merge).
  • Branch names are split into tokens using any of these characters: underscore '_', hyphen  '-', plus '+', or period '.'.
  • Only branches matching the name of the pull request target are added into the merge path. Matching means that every token before the first numeric token must be equal to the corresponding tokens of the target branch's name.
  • Branches are ordered by number, if a given token is numeric. When comparing a numeric token with an ASCII token, the numeric is ranked higher (i.e. is considered as being a newer version).
  • If both tokens are non-numeric, a simple ASCII comparison is used.
  • In the unlikely case of the above algorithm resulting in equality of 2 branch names, a simple string comparison is performed on the whole branch name.
  • There is a limit of 30 merges. 

Branch ordering examples

The table below provides examples of branch naming patterns that Bitbucket Server is able, and not able, to order correctly:

GOOD
  • release/1.0
  • release/1.1-rc1
  • release/1.1
  • release/1.2
  • release/2.0
Bitbucket Server tokenizes on the '.' and the '-' of '1.1-rc1' and is able to order these branch names correctly.
GOOD
  • release/bitbucket_1.1
  • release/bitbucket_1.2
  • release/bitbucket_2.0
Bitbucket Server tokenizes on the '.' and the '_' and orders the numeric parts of these branch names correctly.
BAD
  • release/1.0
  • release/bitbucket_1.1
Bitbucket Server tokenizes on the '.' and the '_' but cannot recognize that 'bitbucket_1.1' should follow '1.0'.
Last modified on Jun 6, 2017

Was this helpful?

Yes
No
Provide feedback about this article
Powered by Confluence and Scroll Viewport.