Jira Software 7.13 Long Term Support release performance report
This page compares the performance of Jira 7.6 and Jira 7.13 Long Term Support release.
About Long Term Support releases
We recommend upgrading Jira regularly, however if your organisation's process means you only upgrade about once a year, upgrading to a Long Term Support release may be a good option, as it provides continued access to critical security, stability, data integrity and performance issues until this version reaches end of life.
Performance
This is an excerpt from the Jira 7.13 performance and scaling report, focusing on performance results for Jira 7.13. You can see the full report here.
Jira 7.13 was not focused solely on performance, however we do aim to provide the same, if not better, performance with each release. In this section, we’ll compare Jira 7.6 to Jira 7.13 Long Term Support release, both Server and Data Center. We ran the same extensive test scenario for both Jira versions.
The following chart presents mean response times of individual actions performed in Jira. To check the details of these actions and the Jira instance they were performed in, see Testing methodology.
Response times for Jira actions
Results
- Jira 7.13.2 shows significant improvement in response time when viewing boards (-30% Server, -30% Data Center), viewing backlogs (-10% Server, -12% Data Center), and viewing project summary (-40% Server, -37% Data Center).
- Most of the actions looks similar between the two versions. We’ve observed small performance degradation when viewing boards in Server (+3% Server, -9% Data Center), viewing dashboards (+5% Server, +1% Data Center), browsing projects (+6% Server, +1% Data Center), and adding comments in DC (0% Server, 1% Data Center).
- The mean of all actions has improved in Jira 7.13.2 (-5% Server, -5% Data Center)
Testing methodology
The following sections detail the testing environment, including hardware specification, and methodology we used in our performance tests.